Editorial Guidelines

Editorial guidelines provide the criteria and directives for manuscript submission and acceptance; therefore, authors must review them prior to submission. The structures and sections corresponding to each submission type are presented below, along with formatting guidelines and an overview of the double-blind peer review process.

Submission Types

Each submission type possesses distinct characteristics determined by the nature of the topic—which must be directly or indirectly linked to education—and its intended publishing objective. Accordingly, the identifying features and structural elements of each submission type are detailed below.

Section: Research

a) Research Article

A text that precisely and succinctly presents the results obtained from an innovative project associated with a specific topic. It highlights the relevance of the research question and hypothesis, supported by empirical findings and conclusions.

General Structure

  • Title (in Spanish and English).

  • Author names, affiliations, corresponding author designation, country, email, and ORCID.

  • Abstract (in Spanish and English).

  • Keywords (in Spanish and English).

  • Introduction.

  • Materials and Methods.

  • Results.

  • Discussion and Conclusions.

  • Acknowledgments.

  • References.

Section Specifications

Abstract: Must be precise, with a maximum length of 150 words, written in both Spanish and English. It should briefly state the research purpose, methodology, main results, and conclusions. Avoid references and non-standard or uncommon abbreviations; if essential, they must be defined upon first mention.

Keywords: A maximum of five keywords, arranged alphabetically, which must provide a clear idea of the article's focus and be included in the IRESIE controlled vocabulary. The English translation (Keywords) must be provided.

Introduction: Contextualizes the topic with a general description of the object of study, subjects/individuals, population, or sample. It must outline the theoretical framework from the chosen perspectives, preferably citing research published in indexed journals. It should briefly describe the background, the problem/question, and objectives to facilitate the understanding and evaluation of the study's results, nature, and scope. Furthermore, it must include a justification of the object of study and its contribution to education, alongside the work's objective(s) and hypothesis. Crucially, the theoretical foundation, background, and justification must explicitly relate to education.

Materials and Methods: Presentation of the methodological framework, explaining the type of research, strategies or procedures followed, data collection techniques (instruments), and statistical analysis used to project the results.

Results: Description and analysis of the main findings and, where applicable, the solution to the problem. Data may be presented in tables, graphs, figures, and images, ensuring no duplication within the text. Captions must be concise, clear, and numbered sequentially.

Discussion and Conclusions: Analysis and contrast of the results against the hypotheses and findings from other studies. It must integrate the main conclusions, present contributions, and address limitations or uncontrolled variables. Additionally, it may include recommendations or future perspectives (depending on the manuscript type) grounded in the study's findings.

Manuscript Length: Maximum of 6,500 words, excluding references and captions for tables, graphs, figures, and images (up to a combined maximum of six items). A maximum of three appendices may be included. The manuscript must not exceed 50 references that theoretically support the phenomenon under study.

b) Experience and Innovation Report

In the evolution of Higher Education Institutions (HEIs), knowledge construction based on the review and analysis of novel and innovative educational experiences constitutes a fundamental pillar of the core teaching function. Hence, it is crucial to encourage educational professionals to engage in the discussion and reflection of their own practice by reconstructing, analyzing, and interpreting these experiences.

The preparation of an experience and innovation report aims to foster systematization processes, wherein educational professionals conduct a critical interpretation of the logic and meanings that shape their practice, thereby socializing the results achieved.

General Structure

  • Title (in Spanish and English).

  • Author names with affiliations, corresponding author designation, country, email, and ORCID.

  • Abstract (in Spanish and English).

  • Keywords (in Spanish and English).

  • Introduction.

  • Materials and Methods.

  • Results.

  • Discussion and Conclusions.

  • Acknowledgments.

  • References.

Section Specifications

Abstract: Must be precise, with a maximum length of 150 words, written in both Spanish and English. It should briefly outline the report's purpose, methodology, and primary results and conclusions. Avoid references and non-standard or uncommon abbreviations; if essential, they must be defined upon first mention.

Keywords: A maximum of five keywords, arranged alphabetically, which must give an idea of the article's content and be included in the IRESIE controlled vocabulary. The English translation (Keywords) must be provided.

Introduction: Contextualizes the topic (its setting and origin). It must present the theoretical foundation of the state of the art, explicitly detailing the concepts and theories adopted, including references that support this background. Additionally, a justification of the topic is required (why it is important for education, the objective of the work, the target audience, and the expected contribution).

Materials and Methods: Describes, explains, and substantiates the methodological procedure employed to systematize the experience, as well as the tools or materials utilized.

Results: Describes, explains, interprets, and analyzes the experience and its outcomes.

Discussion and Conclusions: Compares results (obtained vs. expected) and provides a detailed account of the limitations or challenges encountered. Grounded recommendations must be made based on the initial objectives.

Manuscript Length: Maximum of 4,500 words, excluding references and captions for tables, graphs, figures, and images (up to a combined maximum of four items). A maximum of three appendices may be included, and submissions may be supported by video-recorded material. The report must not exceed 50 references.

c) Theoretical/Literatura Review Article

The core premise is to conduct an investigation that summarizes and analyzes information on a specific topic: its advancements and relevant theoretical approaches. Authors must adopt a critical stance toward the conclusions of the studies included in the review, addressing what is known about the topic, what has been investigated, and which aspects remain unexplored.

General Structure

  • Title (in Spanish and English).

  • Author names with affiliations, corresponding author designation, country, email, and ORCID.

  • Abstract (in Spanish and English).

  • Keywords (in Spanish and English).

  • Introduction.

  • Method.

  • Development/Body.

  • Discussion and Conclusions.

  • Acknowledgments.

  • References.

Section Specifications

Abstract: Must be precise, with a maximum length of 150 words, written in both Spanish and English. It should briefly indicate the purpose of the theoretical review, the method, and the main conclusions. Avoid references and non-standard or uncommon abbreviations; if essential, they must be defined upon first mention.

Keywords: A maximum of five keywords, arranged alphabetically, which must give an idea of the article's focus and be included in the IRESIE controlled vocabulary. The English translation (Keywords) must be provided.

Introduction: Specifies the conceptual or investigative object under review, positioning the topic, problem, or object of reflection within the context of the educational field. It must state the objective of the theoretical review, the critical questions guiding it, and the analytical strategies used. If necessary, it may include the historical development or the temporal and spatial scope (national or international) of the study.

Method: Describes the information search and retrieval process (highlighting the critical questions that guided the review and the analytical strategies), as well as the selection criteria specifying the reviewed works.

Development/Body: Presents, in an argumentative manner, a critical and reflective analysis of the contributions to the educational research field, structured around theoretical categories or formulations.

Discussion and Conclusions: Presents the discussion of the topic based on the results of the theoretical research in relation to its purposes and the educational field in which it is integrated. It should include a reflection on the scientific and social relevance of the knowledge generated, paving the way for new hypotheses and lines of research.

Manuscript Length: Maximum of 6,500 words, excluding references and captions for tables, graphs, figures, and images (up to a combined maximum of six items). A maximum of three appendices may be included, and the text must not exceed 50 references.

Section: Science and Educational Outreach

a)Educational/Scientific Outreach Article

A generally brief text aimed at a non-specialized audience that presents and explains facts, concepts, ideas, or discoveries within a field or discipline resulting from a research process. It contributes to the understanding of educational themes/problems using clear, concise language accessible to interested readers.

General Structure

  • Title (in Spanish and English).

  • Author names with affiliations, corresponding author designation, country, email, and ORCID.

  • Abstract (in Spanish and English).

  • Keywords (in Spanish and English).

  • Introduction.

  • Development/Body.

  • Conclusion.

  • Acknowledgments.

  • References.

Section Specifications

Abstract: Must be precise, with a maximum length of 150 words, written in Spanish and English. It briefly indicates the purpose of the outreach piece and the primary results and conclusions. Avoid references and non-standard or uncommon abbreviations; if essential, they must be defined upon first mention.

Keywords: A maximum of five keywords, arranged alphabetically, that outline the article's scope and are included in the IRESIE controlled vocabulary. The English translation (Keywords) must be provided.

Introduction: Presentation of the topic of interest and an overview of relevant background information.

Development/Body: An orderly and clear explanation of the topic, relying on arguments that back the presented information and research findings.

Conclusion: Summarizes the most critical information regarding the topic and underscores the purpose of disseminating this knowledge.

Manuscript Length: Maximum of 3,000 words, excluding references (maximum of 10) and captions for tables, graphs, figures, and images (up to a combined maximum of three items).

b) Analysis and Perspective

A text that presents a set of ideas attempting to demonstrate/defend a thesis or answer a question through the analysis, interpretation, or evaluation of a specific topic. In this type of writing, the author's stance must be clearly discernible as they attempt to resolve a problem via structured argumentation.

Demonstrating the thesis or answering the question requires the author to articulate ideas through critical thinking.

General characteristics include the use of formal language (written in the first person singular/plural, third person plural, or impersonal form), relevant and well-substantiated content, and a structure that demonstrates coherence between the introduction, development, and conclusion.

General Structure

  • Title (in Spanish and English).

  • Author names with affiliations, corresponding author designation, country, email, and ORCID.

  • Abstract (in Spanish and English).

  • Keywords (in Spanish and English).

  • Introduction.

  • Development/Body.

  • Conclusion.

  • Acknowledgments.

  • References.

Section Specifications

Abstract: Must be precise, with a maximum length of 150 words, written in Spanish and English. It must briefly state the purpose of the analysis, the question to be answered or thesis to be proven, as well as the main results and conclusions. Avoid references and non-standard or uncommon abbreviations; if essential, they must be defined upon first mention.

Keywords: A maximum of five keywords, arranged alphabetically, providing an overview of the article's focus and included in the IRESIE controlled vocabulary. The English translation (Keywords) must be provided.

Introduction: Presents the purpose and the topic being addressed, along with a brief description of the content and organization of ideas. It outlines the question to be answered or the thesis to be demonstrated. It is necessary to delimit the topic and focus it on a point of interest to capture the reader's attention.

Development/Body: Expounds upon the aspects outlined in the introduction, moving from general elements of the topic to the specific arguments supporting the thesis or answering the proposed question. Its organization depends on the topic and the author's intent. This section is vital as it demonstrates the capacity to organize, present, and argue in a well-founded manner.

Conclusion: Recapitulates the main ideas presented in the introduction and development sections. It begins with a brief summary and ends with a reflective statement that closes the argued thesis or resolves the proposed question.

Manuscript Length: Maximum of 6,000 words, excluding references and captions for tables, graphs, figures, and images (up to a combined maximum of five items). A maximum of three appendices may be included, and the submission can be supported by video-recorded material. The article must not exceed 20 references.

c) Letter to the Editor

Focuses on a critical analysis of an article previously published in the journal, identifying potential errors or areas of improvement to stimulate discussion and an exchange of ideas that advance knowledge. The publication of this manuscript will always grant the author(s) of the original article the opportunity to reply, explaining or justifying the observations raised.

General Structure

  • Title (in Spanish and English).

  • Author names with affiliations, corresponding author designation, country, email, and ORCID.

  • Abstract (in Spanish and English).

  • Keywords (in Spanish and English).

  • Introduction.

  • Development/Body.

  • Discussion and Conclusions.

  • References.

Section Specifications

Abstract: Must be precise, with a maximum length of 150 words, written in Spanish and English. It must briefly indicate the purpose of the letter and its contributions to the original article. Avoid references and non-standard or uncommon abbreviations; if essential, they must be defined upon first mention.

Keywords: A maximum of five keywords, arranged alphabetically, providing an idea of the letter's focus and included in the IRESIE controlled vocabulary. The English translation (Keywords) must be provided.

Introduction: Contextualizes the article under critical analysis based on the discipline or the author's theoretical stance.

Development/Body: Must contain scientific observations and commentary regarding the article published in the journal, backed by theoretical, conceptual, or methodological foundations.

Discussion and Conclusions: Presents a conclusion based on the critical analysis and proposes one or more recommendations regarding the article.

Manuscript Length: Maximum of 1,500 words. One table, graph, or figure is permitted, along with up to six references. The authors of the original manuscript will be given the right of reply.

Formatting Guidelines for Submissions

Title: Concise and informative, written in both Spanish and English, with a maximum of 20 words. Titles are frequently used in information retrieval systems; thus, avoid abbreviations and formulas wherever possible.

Author Names and Affiliations: Clearly state the first and last names of each author. Institutional affiliation (institution name and country) must be provided immediately below the author's full name. Append the ORCID iD at the end.

Corresponding Author: Clearly indicate who will handle correspondence at all stages of peer review and publication. These details must be kept updated by the corresponding author.

Open Research and Contributor ID (ORCID): ORCID is a unique identifier designed to provide researchers with a persistent and unambiguous author code. This distinguishes their scientific output and prevents confusion stemming from identical or similar personal names. A researcher's ORCID iD remains permanent, transcending linguistic variations, changes in institutional affiliation, or discrepancies in scientific signing habits. Authors must create their ORCID profile at https://orcid.org/

Abbreviations in Keywords: Only firmly established abbreviations within the field of research are eligible, as these terms are utilized for indexing purposes.

Acknowledgments: Positioned at the end of the article, prior to the references. List individuals who provided help during the research (e.g., language editing, technical assistance, proofreading, etc.).

Funding Sources: Mention funding sources in a standard format to facilitate compliance with funder requirements. If the support originates from a block grant or other resources available within a university, college, or funding research institution, use the following template: “This work was supported by the National Institute of... [grant numbers xxxx, aaaa]”. If no funding was provided, include the following sentence: “This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.”

General Guidelines

  • Submit the manuscript as a single Word file to be used in the peer-review process. The body text must be in 12-point Arial font. Use bold and regular style for first-order headings; bold and italics for second-order headings; and regular italics (no bold) for third-order headings.

  • The beginning of each paragraph must have a 2 cm indent, except at the start of a section. Do not include extra spacing between paragraphs. Use 1.5 line spacing.

  • It is recommended that pages contain four to six paragraphs, each with a minimum of four lines and a maximum of eleven lines.

  • Text lines must be numbered consecutively throughout the manuscript.

  • Footnotes are not permitted.

  • If images are used to illustrate content, they must be royalty-free and submitted separately in JPG or TIFF format (at 300 dpi).

  • Tables and graphs must be embedded within the text and also submitted separately in an editable format, preferably in Excel or Canva.

  • It is the responsibility of the authors to establish and submit the correct author order and corresponding author designation from the onset of the editorial process. Once the article is published, no modifications can be made to the author list or the corresponding author assignment.

  • Authors must declare any relevant competing interests (i.e., ensure there are no conflicts of interest among them).

  • Once authors are notified that their manuscript complies with the journal's guidelines, they must nominate two researchers who could serve as potential peer reviewers for the journal to initiate the evaluation process. These suggestions must include: full name, academic degree, lines of research, email, and telephone number.

SIMPLIFIED PRIVACY NOTICE

The Ministry of Education of Veracruz (Secretaría de Educación de Veracruz) is responsible for processing the personal data provided, which will be protected in accordance with the provisions of Law 316 for the Protection of Personal Data in Possession of Obligated Entities for the State of Veracruz and other applicable regulations.

Editorial Process

Manuscripts will undergo an evaluation process divided into the following stages:

a) Preliminary Screening: Evaluation by the journal's Editorial Committee to verify compliance with editorial guidelines.

b) Similarity & AI Detection: The manuscript is analyzed using Plagius software to detect the use of AI, overlaps with previously published texts, repetitive citation inconsistencies, etc., which may indicate a lack of originality. In such cases, the manuscript will be rejected outright, unless the issue is minimal and rectifiable by the author(s).

c) Peer Review Assignment: If accepted for review, the Editorial Committee will forward the manuscript to the appropriate Associate Editor, who will assign a pair of reviewers (ensuring strict anonymity for both authors and reviewers). This review is conducted online via a double-blind process.

d) Evaluation Period: The review and evaluation of manuscripts will be conducted by two specialists in the subject matter within a three-month timeframe. In the event of conflicting evaluations, the manuscript will be sent to a third reviewer so that the Associate Editor can issue a definitive decision.

Review Outcomes

e) The Editorial Committee will notify the author of the evaluation outcome, which may be:

  1. Publish without changes.

  2. Publish pending minor revisions.

  3. Publish pending major revisions.

  4. Reject.

If the manuscript is accepted conditionally, the author(s) commit to making the indicated corrections.

The journal reserves the right to make copyediting modifications it deems necessary. The final editorial decision is unappealable.

Note on Multiple Submissions: If the Editorial Committee approves two or more articles for publication whose research teams or co-authorships overlap by at least one member, these articles will be scheduled for publication in different issues of the journal. Similarly, if two or more articles by a single author are approved within the same year, they will be published in separate issues.