The role of postdocs within scientific careers: an international-level perspective
Keywords:
employability, scientific careers, postdoctorate, young scientistsAbstract
In this essay we offer an international-level analysis of the role, associated problematics, and job perspectives of postdoctoral researchers in science. Despite the fact that postdoctoral training originated as an opportunity to strengthen the abilities of recently graduated PhDs, a consistent and systematic definition of this position is lacking. Here we analyze the current situation of postdocs in different countries, and offer some considerations and recommendations. In general, postdocs are highly qualified and represent one of the most productive groups in academia. Unfortunately, today obtaining employment opportunities in academia represents a challenge, whose difficulty increases exponentially. Moreover, postdoctoral positions can become long impasse phases instead of being stepping stones to satisfactory appointments. Economic conditions, financial crises, and the indifference and corruption of policy makers seem to represent the most critical problems affecting postdoctoral careers worldwide.
References
Åkerlind, G. S. (2005). Postdoctoral researchers: roles, functions and career prospects. Higher Education Research & Development, 24(1), 21-40.
Arbeit, C. A., y Kang, K. H. (2017). Field composition of postdocs shifts as numbers decline in biological sciences and in clinical medicine. National Science Foundation. Recuperado de https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/2017/nsf17309/
Association of American Medical Colleges [AAMC]. (2006). Compact between postdoctoral appointees and their mentors. Recuperado de https://www.aamc.org/initiatives/research/postdoccompact/
Associazione Dottorandi e Dottori di Ricerca Italiani [ADI]. (2017). VII Indagine ADI su Dottorato e Post-Doc. Recuperado de https://dottorato.it/content/vii-indagine-adi-su-dottoratoe-post-doc
Chen, S., McAlpine, L., y Amundsen, C. (2015). Postdoctoral positions as preparation for desired careers: a narrative approach to understanding postdoctoral experience. Higher Education Research & Development, 34(6), 1083-1096.
Grinstein, A., y Treister, R. (2017). The unhappy postdoc: a survey based study [version 1; referees: 4 approved with reservations]. F1000Research, 6, 1642. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.12538.1
Marceau, J., y Preston, H. (1996). Taking the lead: The ARC fellowship scheme in Australia. Canberra, Australia: Australian Government Publishing Service.
National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering e Institute of Medicine of the National Academies. (2014). The postdoctoral experience revisited. Washington D. C., EE.UU.: The National Academies Press.
OECD. (2018). Main Science and Technology Indicators. OECD. Better policies for better lives. Recuperado de http://www.oecd.org/sti/msti.htm
Pain, E. (2015). A time limit on postdoctoral contracts: The French experience. Science. doi:10.1126/science.caredit.a1500111
Powell, K. (2015). The future of the postdoc. Nature, 520(7546), 144-147. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/520144a
Welham, M. (2016). Recognition for unsung heroes of research? BBSRC. Biosciencie for the future. Building the bioeconomy. Recuperado de http://blogs.bbsrc.ac.uk/index.php/2016/09/recognition-for-unsung-heroes-of-research/
Yamaner, M. (2018). Full-time graduate enrollment in science and engineering continues to grow in 2016 due to increased enrollment by foreign students on temporary visas. National Science Foundation. Recuperado de https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/2018/nsf18307/nsf18307.pdf
Yorke, M. (2006). Employability in higher education: What it is-what it is not. York, Reino Unido: Higher Education Academy
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
